Media protip: the smartphone

This turned out to be way harder than expected. Do you agree?

All examples of convergence seem to be too obvious to even bother to discuss. What to do then? I decided to pick up the absolute cliché: so obvious and mundane that it is almost impossible to miss. Still, one that is completely overlooked.

I give to you: the smartphone.

I told you it was too obvious to consider. But I believe there is something else to this example of media and technological convergence. Something that might be useful to us as media specialists but also something that might cost us our future jobs.

The smartphone is indeed an extraordinary product of convergence. It has changed both how audiences treat themselves and how the media treat them. However, the occurred changes and implications differ.

What has changed for users? Simple. Everything is now within the convenient reach of one’s pocket. Users are granted access to technologies used by the media (audio recorders, good quality cameras, microphones etc.) in order to make news. The gap between media producers and media consumers has narrowed dramatically, if not disappeared. Something remarkable happened: the audience could finally be its own news provider (Allan, 2013).

What about us? For those working in the news industry, this convergence brought the wonders of ‘mobile reporting:’ a faster, more effective way of getting content back to the newsroom.  News gathering, content production and distribution became easier than ever. The smartphone was now our camera, recorder, microphone and notebook. We were our crew. Twitter was our sharing platform.

The primary implication: we can now produce news constantly and in larger quantities. Exactly what the ‘news machine’ needs. Or, is it?

Smartphones are available to everybody. Therefore, everybody can perform ‘mobile reporting.’ Where does that place us? Will we be left unemployed?

Maybe converging was not such a good idea after all . . .

Advertisements

1 Comment

  1. I think the points you’ve raised are very interesting! Social media and in particular Twitter are often the first place audiences go to read about a news event and often is the first place someone goes when they have seen something/been part of a big event – effectively becoming a news reporter themselves. It’s a place where audiences can offer differing opinions and perspectives on a particular event. However, I think audiences will always look to more traditional forms of news in order to get the facts and a more unbiased perspective. Social media is not always trustworthy or accurate and audiences are aware of this. Perhaps, though, journalists will have to adapt and change the ways they report, accepting this convergence. News apps are an obvious example of this.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s