Flickr: Creative Commons

flickr.jpgFlickr is a well-known online picture sharing platform, and many of its users have chosen to share their work under a Creative Commons license, forgoing traditional copyright.

This allows for users to differentiate between the types of Attribution License, Attribution-NoDerivs License, Attribution-NonCommercial License, Attribution-ShareAlike License, and finally two forms of Public Domain for their work, leaving creatives in full charge of how they’d like their work to be hosted.

Screen Shot 2016-03-16 at 14.47.38.png

Given the free features of the site and the obvious benefit unknown artists reap from getting their work spread and altered by other users, leading to “getting their stuff out there”, I’m a bit skeptical.

Looser copyright regulations, especially when it comes to visual artwork, can often lead to someone using your personal pictures for questionable purposes – even identity theft, or finding ways to capitalise on your work or altered versions of it. It would suffice to be uninformed about the different forms of licenses for someone to allow a mishap like that themselves, and accidentally pick the wrong kind of license for their intentions, which is why being informed about internet laws is vital.

Nevertheless, Flickr emphasises that it is a community, and seeks to aid and cater to all sorts of people in the creative industries, a concept which has definitely been working. They “want to help people make their photos available to the people who matter to them”, ensuring that photographers get their work spread in an adequate manner.

Advertisements

2 Comments

  1. This is an interesting post. I assumed that the users on Flickr published their work under one license that didn’t allow other people to share their work or copy it. I agree that this could lead to plagiarism, but on the other hand it can be a lead to a good thing because it means other people are free to share the work, which means more chance of exposure.

    Like

  2. I never would have thought that there is so many different licenses deriving from copyright, very interesting.
    I agree with you as to how loosened copyright regulations can lead to your pictures being used for unwanted purposes – e.g. Memes. As we have learnt in our lecture this morning, Memes can often cause embarrassment. I found this Vice article regarding the life after becoming a Meme https://www.vice.com/en_uk/read/what-happens-to-people-when-they-become-a-meme-078

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s